���������

POSTING TYPE: Calls: Journals

Posted by: Elizabeth Nixon

---

JOURNAL OF MARKETING MANAGEMENT SPECIAL ISSUE CALL FOR PAPERS

��Harnessing the Power of Imagination for Good:��Marketing Spells, Consumers’ Fantasies and Dreams of a Better World

Guest Editors:

Teresa Pereira Heath, University of Minho, Portugal
Elizabeth Nixon, University of Nottingham, UK

‘Fantasy is not just whimsical ego-nonsense but comes really from the depths; it constellates symbolic situations which give life a deeper meaning and a deeper realization.’ (von Franz, 1996, p. 103)

Fantasies, daydreams, or the stories of our imagination are not simply ‘airy nothings’ (Singer, 1975, p. 3) intruding into our daily affairs. Instead, as the psychologist and folklorist von Franz considers, they are profound reflections of our inner selves and can infuse our lives with purpose and meaning.

The entanglement of fantasies with consumption is central to the marketing industry and the culture of consumption more generally. Fantasy has been recognised as a foundational element of consumer behaviour since the seminal works of Holbrook and Hirschman (1982) and Hirschman and Holbrook (1982), and has been linked to desire (Belk et al., 1996; 2002) and the joys or pleasures of consumption (Campbell, 1987/2018; Seregina, 2014). Contemporary marketing, especially advertising, commonly operates in the realm of fantasy by crafting stories and narratives of enchantment, illusion and heroism, a process which imbues products with an ‘aura of magic’ (Alvesson, 2013, p. 43), while offering consumers promises of ‘magical” transformation’ (Heath & Heath, 2016; St James et al., 2011; Otnes & Scott, 1996) and opportunities for identity development (Belk & Costa, 1988; Seregina, 2014). This instrumentalisation of fantasy for commercial purposes is critiqued by Zipes (1997; 2002), who draws on Adorno and Horkheimer (1972) to explain how marketing and the broader ‘culture industry’ turn cultural expressions into commodities, thereby reinforcing capitalism’s dominance and limiting people’s autonomy and their capacity to envision alternative social realities.

Nevertheless, while marketers may shape consumers’ fantasies, they can only do so with the material generated by these consumers’ universal propensity to imagine. Many consumers are happy ‘to chase unicorns and use the enchantment of consumption as a tool to build dreams of a better existence’ (Heath & Heath, 2016, p. 823). However, we still lack an adequate account of how fantasy interacts with marketing and material consumption to influence consumer experiences and afford meaning or value. For example, it has been observed that imaginative anticipation has a value in itself that consumers may wish to preserve (Heath & Nixon, 2021) and that this can dampen as well as drive Campbell’s (1987/2018, p. 145) ‘desire-acquisition-use-disillusionment-renewed desire’ cycle, but the details of when the desire to acquire will be heightened and when it will be reduced remain hazy. Furthermore, human imagination holds the potential to conceive of radically different ways of interacting with consumption that can help solve social and environmental crises, a topic that current scholarship has neglected.

One form of imagination that has particular relevance to marketing is daydreaming. In his seminal research programme, Jerome Singer defined daydreaming as a ‘shift of attention away´ from some task ‘toward an unfolding sequence of private responses made to some internal stimulus’ (Singer, 1975, p. 3) that can occur without conscious intention. These private responses are usually understood to be ‘pictures in the mind’s eyes… memories or creatively constructed images of future events of varying degrees of everyday occurrence” (Singer, 1975, p. 4). Indeed, subsequent sociological work has shown just how small these varying degrees can be; our daydreams are often highly scripted by the culture and social environments in which we are immersed. Many of our daydreams are thus remarkably similar. Derived from our individual histories and goals and shaped by cultural context, they come to be seen as the self-implicating manifestations of deeply personal self-ideals or wishes (Campbell, 1987/2018; Cohen and Taylor, 1993; McCracken, 1988) and may be all the more jealously guarded for that (Person, 1996).

Daydreams are of particular interest in studying consumption due to their ubiquity and their considerable influence on how meaning is attached to commodities (Campbell, 1987/2018; McCracken, 1988). For psychologists, daydreaming is pivotal in emotional regulation, motivation, daily planning, and retrospection. It can serve as a coping mechanism for boredom, provide an escape from difficult circumstances and offer dreamers pleasure, excitement, and a sense of freedom or control over their lives (e.g. Ehn & Löfgren, 2010; Singer, 1966; 1975). Future-orientated daydreams can give individuals something ‘to look forward to’ (Heath & Nixon, 2021) and, in doing so, inspire dreamers to reach their goals and afford them hope. For psychoanalysts, daydreams may not be the simple manifestation of conscious wishes but the distorted manifestation of unconscious ones (Freud, 1899/1991). In psychoanalysis, the content of a daydream is thus always the result of a compromise between wishes and defensive mechanisms; in other words, a daydream is a product of desire that is distorted by forces opposing their realisation. From this perspective, desire for a particular object or activity may be rooted in an unconscious phantasy for a different object or activity (Gabriel, 1999).

While often perceived as a purely cognitive phenomenon, daydreams hold the potential to transcend the internal realm of daydreamers. They may manifest as embodied experiences, carrying tangible sensations and affects that are subjectively perceived as authentic (Heath & Nixon, 2021). People who have been encouraged, rather than admonished, to nurture the playful realm of their imaginations may have thus developed the skills for extended immersion in the inner world. Such experiences can be so powerful – in soothing anxiety, in stimulating arousal, in producing pleasure – that they are treasured. Alternatively, daydream scenarios may be borrowed from a favourite film or novel (Person, 1995) and may be no less meaningful to the dreamer. Such effects underscore the substantial influence that daydreams can exert on individuals’ emotions and behaviour, as well as the power that shaping consumers’ daydreams has as a tool for marketers. Daydreams may also be divulged to a trusted partner or friend and then co-constructed or shared. However, daydreams’ often private, subjective, and ephemeral nature means that investigating them may be challenging, requiring methods capable of capturing participants’ inner thoughts and which are sensitive to the ethical issues arising. The methodological challenges of gathering empirical data on daydreaming forms is also complicated by the fact that people may differ markedly in the extent to which they daydream, how elaborate it may become, and their capability to recall the details or even to recognise their own imaginative activities.

Thus, it is not surprising that published empirical research into daydreaming phenomena and consumption is relatively scant. What does exist includes d’ Astous and Deschênes (2005), Denegri‐Knott and Molesworth (2010), Jenkins et al. (2011), Heath and Nixon (2021), and Preece and Skandalis (2024). Fournier and Guiry (1993) first identified pre-purchase dreaming as a prevalent phenomenon within consumer culture, in which consumers engage to anticipate consumption and plan purchases because of the intrinsic enjoyment afforded by the experience.�� Indeed, daydreams are pleasurable per se, to the extent that they can replace actual consumption when the latter is difficult or impossible to realise (d’Astous & Deschênes, 2005), or when daydreamers simply prefer to prolong anticipation, build up excitement, or keep possibilities open (Heath & Nixon, 2021). However, the degree to which consumer goods form the focus or merely the setting of a daydream has been debated (Jenkins et al., 2011); a focus on daydreams about commodities may indicate the kind of ‘consumption-related centrism’ (Fitchett & Cronin 2022, p. 3) that forecloses a broader and richer understanding of consumer fantasising. In particular, the extent to which daydreams may stimulate, maintain, enhance, or diminish a customer’s journey, and the broader implications of this, have not been fully theorised. For example, how far can Heath and Nixon’s (2021) claim that daydreaming can replace material consumption help envision more fun-filled sustainable societies (Soper 2020; Wilk 2022)?

Current consumer research scholarship has the most to say about pleasurable, future-orientated or desire-filled imaginative forms. Psychological literature also supports the hypothesis that fantasy plays a central role in mastering traumas and problems, regulating emotions and better adapting to reality (Rodomonti et al., 2021). Not all daydreams are positive or constructive (McMillan et al., 2013), however. Daydreams can be unpleasant, past-orientated and involve disappointment, guilt, shame or regret. Many can have maladaptive consequences (Sommer, 2002); immersive imagining can create unmeetable expectations, leading to disappointment, impairing relationships and causing symptoms resembling addictive disorders (Soffer-Dudek & Somer, 2018). To de-romanticise the market (Fitchett & Cronin, 2022), can we confront the darkness of some everyday daydreams to understand how they relate to consumption? How might we better understand the ‘on-off flickerings of intense affect-laden imagery’ (Person 1996, p. 20); the fear, power, guilt, aggression or sadism underpinning our imaginative scenarios and consumer desires? Is daydreaming’s adaptive function as seemingly helpful to individuals as psychology would argue, or is it the kind of reality-denying soma holiday of the commodity fetishist (Cluley & Dunne, 2012) that excuses inaction? Though scholars have argued that daydreaming is a universal human ability, marketing and consumption scholarship has focused on those living in capitalist market economies, offering little that might illuminate the phenomenon in different contexts e.g. those living in subsistence marketplaces (Viswanathan et al., 2012).

Finally, digital, virtual consumption and interactive media further afford marketers new opportunities to influence consumers’ fantasies (Denegri‐Knott & Molesworth, 2010; Preece & Skandalis, 2024). This creates opportunities to improve well-being, for example, in managing emotional issues, as well as risks of harm, both of which are observed in the online trend of deeply immersive ‘reality shifting’ (Somer et al., 2023, p. 11415).

This special issue seeks to expand knowledge of the interactions of consumption with fantasy and daydreaming by combining diverse theoretical and empirical approaches.�� We seek new insights into any aspect of imaginative engagement with consumption, from subtly rewriting memories to immersive world-building. We are also interested in submissions that discuss the role that fantasising and daydreaming can play in transforming marketing and consumption towards a better world (Chandy et al., 2021).

We welcome studies of the consumer imagination from any social science domain, including but not limited to sociology, psychology, CCT, psychoanalysis or anthropology. We especially welcome articles from diverse cultural contexts. Submissions addressing, but not restricted to, the following topics are encouraged:

• What methods can illuminate the interaction of daydreaming and consumption?
• What actions by marketers tend to produce what kinds of daydreams in consumers? What role can technology play in producing these effects?
• How do marketers exert power through shaping consumers’ fantasies, and how do consumers assert agency through consumption in fantasy’?
• What roles do daydreaming and fantasy play in addictive or other harmful consumption?
• Can daydreaming drive more responsible forms of consumption? If ‘the virtual displaces the material’ (Wilk, 2022: 265), how far can daydreaming be a source of sustainable fun?
• What role can marketers play in stimulating people’s fantasies that facilitate a more sustainable society?

Submission Requirements:

Authors should submit manuscripts of between 8,000–10,000 words (excluding tables, references, captions, footnotes and endnotes). All submissions must strictly follow the guidelines for the Journal of Marketing Management. These are available at:

Please note the requirements to include a Summary Statement of Contribution, and to place figures and tables at their correct location within the text. Please also read the following guidelines prior to submitting your manuscript:

• Use of images:
• Use of third-party material:
• Ethical guidelines:

Manuscripts should be submitted online using the T&F Submission Portal for Journal of Marketing Management

().

Authors should prepare and upload two versions of their manuscript (only use alpha-numeric characters or underscores in the filename). One should be a complete text, while in the second all document information identifying the author should be removed from the files to allow them to be sent anonymously to referees.

When uploading files authors will be able to define the non-anonymous version as “Manuscript – with author details”, and the anonymous version as “Manuscript – Anonymous”. To submit your manuscript to the Special Issue choose “Research Article” from the Manuscript Type list in the Submission Portal. On the next screen (Manuscript Details), answer ‘yes’ to the question ‘Are you submitting your paper for a specific special issue or article collection?’. A drop down menu will then appear and you should select the Special Issue Title from this list.

Informal queries regarding guest editors’ expectations or the suitability of specific research topics should be directed to the Special Issue Editors:

Editor Contact Details

• Teresa Pereira Heath pereiraheath@eeg.uminho.pt
• Elizabeth Nixon nixon@nottingham.ac.uk

Key Dates:

• The online system will be open for submissions to this issue from 1 August 2025.
• The closing date for submissions is 1 September 2025.

Technical queries about submissions can be referred to the Editorial Office: rjmmeditorial@westburn.co.uk

References

Adorno, T., & Horkheimer, M. (1972). Dialectic of Enlightenment. Herder & Herder.

Alvesson, M. (2013). The Triumph of Emptiness. Oxford University Press.

Belk, R. W., & Costa, J. A. (1998). The Mountain Man myth: A contemporary consuming fantasy. ��Journal of Consumer Research, 25(3), 218–240.

Belk, R. W., Ger, G., & Askegaard, S. (1996). Metaphors of Consumer Desire. Advances in Consumer Research. Association for Consumer Research (U. S.), 23(1), 368–373.

Belk, R. W., Ger, G., & Askegaard, S. (2003). The missing streetcar named desire. In C. Huffman, D.G. Mick & S. Ratneshwar (Eds.). The Why of Consumption: Contemporary Perspectives on Consumer Motives, Goals and Desires (pp. 98–119). Routledge.

Campbell, C. (1987/2018). The Romantic Ethic and the Spirit of Modern Consumerism (3rd ed.). Basil Blackwell.

Chandy, R. K., Johar, G. V., Moorman, C., & Roberts, J. H. (2021). Better marketing for a better world. Journal of Marketing, 85(3), 1–9.

Cohen, S., & Taylor, L. (1993). Escape Attempts: The Theory and Practice of Resistance in Everyday Life. Routledge.

Cluley, R., & Dunne, S. (2012). From commodity fetishism to commodity narcissism. Marketing Theory, 12(3), 251–265.

d’Astous, A., & Deschênes, J. (2005). Consuming in one’s mind: An exploration. Psychology and Marketing, 22(1), 1–30.

Denegri‐Knott, J., & Molesworth, M. (2010). Concepts and practices of digital virtual consumption. Consumption Markets & Culture, 13(2), 109–132.

Fournier, S., & Guiry, M. (1993). An Emerald Green Jaguar, A House on Nantucket, and an African Safari:” Wish Lists and Consumption Dreams in Materialist Society. Advances in Consumer Research. Association for Consumer Research (U. S.), 20(1).

Freud, S. (1991). The Interpretation of Dreams. Translated by James Strachey assisted by Alan Tyson, edited by Angela Richards. Penguin. (Original work published 1899)

Gabriel, Y. (1999). Organizations in Depth. Sage.

Heath, T., & Heath, M. (2016). Once upon a time there was a consumer…: Stories of magic and the magic of stories. Journal of Marketing Management, 32(9-10), 811–826.

Heath, T., & Nixon, E. (2021). Immersive imaginative hedonism: Daydreaming as experiential ‘consumption’. Marketing Theory, 21(3), 351–370.

Hirschman, E. C., & Holbrook, M. B. (1982). Hedonic consumption: Emerging concepts, methods and propositions. Journal of Marketing, 46(3), 92–101.

Holbrook, M. B., & Hirschman, E. C. (1982). The experiential aspects of consumption: Consumer fantasies, feelings, and fun. Journal of Consumer Research, 9(2), 132–140.

Fitchett, J. & Cronin, J., (2022). De-romanticising the market: Advances in Consumer Culture Theory, Journal of Marketing Management, 38(1-2), 1-16.

Kearns, P. O., Tyler, J. M., & Graziano, W. G. (2021). More than fantasy: Prosocial daydreams relate to prosocial dispositions and behaviour. International Journal of Psychology, 56(1), 85–94.

St. James, Y., Handelman, J. M., & Taylor, S. F. (2011). Magical thinking and consumer coping. Journal of Consumer Research, 38(4), 632–649.

Jenkins, R., Nixon, E., & Molesworth, M. (2011). ‘Just normal and homely’: The presence, absence and othering of consumer culture in everyday imagining. Journal of Consumer Culture, 11(2), 261–281.

Klinger, E. (2009). Daydreaming and fantasizing: Thought flow and motivation. In K. D. Markman, W. M. P. Klein, & J. A. Suhr (Eds.), Handbook of Imagination and Mental Simulation (pp. 225–239). Psychology Press.

McCracken, G. (1988). Culture and Consumption: New Approaches to the Symbolic Character of Consumer Goods and Activities. Indiana University Press.

McMillan, R. L., Kaufman, S. B., & Singer, J. L. (2013). Ode to positive constructive daydreaming. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 1–9.

Otnes, C., & Scott, L. M. (1996). Something old, something new: Exploring the interaction between ritual and advertising. Journal of Advertising, 25(1), 33–50.

Person, E. (1996). By Force of Fantasy: How we make our lives. Basic Books.

Preece, C., & Skandalis, A. (2024). Time to imagine an escape: Investigating the consumer timework at play in augmented reality. European Journal of Marketing, 58(1), 92–118.

Rodomonti, M., Fedeli, F., De Luca, E., Gazzillo, F., & Bush, M. (2021). The Adaptive Function of Fantasy: A Proposal From the Perspective of Control-Master Theory. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 38(1), 1–11.

Seregina, A. (2014). Exploring fantasy in consumer experiences. Consumer Culture Theory (Research in Consumer Behavior, Vol. 16), Emerald Group Publishing Limited, pp.19-33.

Singer, J. (1975). Daydreaming and Fantasy. Routledge.

Somer, E., Cardeña, E., Catelan, R. F., & Soffer-Dudek, N. (2023). Reality shifting: Psychological features of an emergent online daydreaming culture. Current Psychology (New Brunswick, N.J.), 42, 11415–11427.

Soffer-Dudek, N., & Somer, E. (2018). Trapped in a daydream: Daily elevations in maladaptive daydreaming are associated with daily psychopathological symptoms. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 9, Article 194.

Soper, K. (2020). Post-Growth Living: For an Alternative Hedonism. Verso Books.

Viswanathan, M., Sridharan, S., Ritchie, R., Venugopal, S., & Jung, K. (2012). Marketing Interactions in Subsistence Marketplaces: A Bottom-Up Approach to Designing Public Policy. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 31(2), 159–177.

von Franz, M. (1996). The Interpretation of Fairy Tales. Shambhala Publications, Inc.

Wilk, R. (2022). Taking fun seriously in envisioning sustainable consumption. Consumption and Society, 1(2), 255–272.

Zipes, J. (1997). Happily Ever After: Fairy tales, children, and the culture industry. Routledge.

Zipes, J. (2002). When Dreams Come True: Classical fairy tales and their tradition. Routledge.