TOC: Judgment Dec Making
Introduction
Judgment and Decision Making, 8(5)
Belief in the unstructured interview: The persistence of an illusion
–Jason Dana, Robyn Dawes, Nathaniel Peterson [] []
Game interrupted: The rationality of considering the future
–Brandon Almy, Joachim I. Krueger [] []
An assessment of the temporal dynamics of moral decisions
–Gregory J. Koop [] []
Response time and decision making: An experimental study
–Ariel Rubenstein [] []
How do defendants choose their trial court? Evidence for a heuristic processing account
–Mandeep K. Dhami, David R. Mandel [] []
Preference-driven biases in decision makers’ information search and evaluation
–Anne-Sophie Chaxel, J. Edward Russo, Neda Kerimi [] [Google Scholar]
Choice blindness in financial decision making
–Owen McLaughlin, Jason Somerville [] []
External validity of individual differences in multiple cue probability learning: The case of pilot training
–Nadine Matton, Eric Raufaste, Stephane Vautier [] []
Charting the internal landscape: Affect associated with thoughts about major life domains explains life satisfaction
–Talya Miron-Shatz, Ed Diener, Glen M. Doniger, Tyler Moore, Shimon Saphire-Bernstein [] []
Myopic loss aversion: Potential causes of replication failures
–Alexander Klos [] []
A Criticism of Doyle’s survey of time preference: A correction regarding the CRDI and CADI families
–Han Bleichrodt, Rogier J. D. Potter van Loon, Kirsten I. M. Rohde, Peter P. Wakker [] [Google Scholar]
Social distance decreases responders’ sensitivity to fairness in the ultimatum game
–Hyunji Kim, Simone Schnall, Do-Joon Yi, Mathew P. White [] [Google Scholar]
Retraction: Shame for money: Shame enhances the incentive value of economic resources,
–Chia-Chi Wang, Ying-Yao Cheng, Wen-Bin Chiou, Chun-Chia Kung [] []
| The Hardware and Software Behind ELMAR Is Paid for with ÂÜÀòÉç¹ÙÍø Dues Please Support ELMAR by or renewing your membership |