TOC: Res Policy
Introduction
Research Policy, 36(7)
 : : : TOC
: : journals |
Relevant ARCategory: |
Keeping plagiarism at bay—A salutary tale
–Ben R. Martin [] []
Erratum
Retraction notice to ‘Estimating demand for SDI-related spin-off technologies’ (Res. Policy 22 (1) (1993) 73–80)
–Hans W. Gottinger [] []
Original Articles
Profit distribution and compensation structures in publicly and privately funded hybrid venture capital funds
–Mikko Jääskeläinen, Markku Maula and Gordon Murray [] []
Fishing upstream: Firm innovation strategy and university research alliances
–Janet E.L. Bercovitz and Maryann P. Feldman [] []
Public procurement and innovation—Resurrecting the demand side
–Jakob Edler and Luke Georghiou [] []
The impact of R&D spillovers on UK manufacturing TFP: A dynamic panel approach
–Dolores Añón Higón [] []
On the value of project safeguards: Embedding real options in complex products and systems
–Nuno Gil [] []
Double-boom cycles and the comeback of science-push and market-pull?
–Ulrich Schmoch [] []
Optimal cognitive distance and absorptive capacity
–Bart Nooteboom, Wim Van Haverbeke, Geert Duysters, Victor Gilsing and Ad van den Oord [] []
The determinants of research output and impact: A study of Mexican researchers
–Claudia Gonzalez-Brambila and Francisco M. Veloso [] []
Commercialization of patents and external financing during the R&D phase
–Roger Svensson [] []
Co-evolution of physical and social technologies in clinical practice: The case of HIV treatments
–Monica Merito and Andrea Bonaccorsi [] []
Techno therapy or nurtured niches? Technology studies and the evaluation of radical innovations
–Anique Hommels, Peter Peters and Wiebe E. Bijker [] []
Comment on ‘Techno therapy or nurtured niches?’ by Hommels et al. (Res. Policy 36 (7) (2007))
–Frank W. Geels and Johan Schot [] []
Reply to Geels and Schot
–Anique Hommels, Peter Peters and Wiebe E. Bijker [] []